Topic Erebus

Erebus wrote:I believe this fight contains more than just bunnying for responses read in the OOC, actions taken in the OOC without clarity, and further slanderous messages for simply responding to his own “bunnying” through-out this fight, he is basically using OOC stances and ego-maniacal behavior to try and speak as if I’m not intelligible for combat rp-- which to me is enough right to engage a call for a battlemods decision. The battlemod, as shown, must see the overall same patterns I do but alas, where should I start:

“ Invaders must have an IC reason to invade a topic which includes the invaders knowing the individual prior to invading them, either by meeting them in person or via a third party such as the Bounty Board. This is to avoid OOC reasons getting in the way of roleplaying. “


> You can prep attacks first post, that's only invalidated in invasion rules.
@Vice#2837


My debate starts in that you think this isn’t an ‘invasion’ thread just because it isn’t stated and you tagged me to the fight, you effectively pretend the ruling does not go over but “Erebus” is not in the thread title so I overturn your actions and argue that this could be considered an invasion which nullifies your arguments to most of what I’m going to get onto right now. To buff first with your motions on entry post 1 is effectively breaking the invasion rules that I say you can’t force as not regarding this thread. In your own writing you have searched for me and in my own writing I hear from a bounty board, as that’s the only way I would have, I met you later in the day by force of cost to this invasion rule not to ‘speed blitz godmod’ as you so claim to assume about me.

You act very paranoid as if staff, me, or Muzi are out to get you ,and use terms such as bad-impression as if I need to respect you or the staff on site owe you for being a general dick and accusing people of things you, yourself, are doing. Being a child doesn’t exactly prove bold of a counterclaim, even your own post seems to suggest you’re calling me a ‘Nothing Personal” kid, Perhaps I am, for not rolling over and allowing an obvious box of control over me. A good argument he could present is that he has no bounty and thus this isn’t an invasion, but his own wording suggests he put up a fight announcement in town, and thus identifies himself as a challenger to me that way. So it should be up to me to decide since I am the person stuck without as little context as possible and was expected to play right into every single thing he tried to do. Those are his words suggesting we aren;t in an Invasion Thread, but it is I who will assume he has admitted to ignoring this as a combat thread where I’m offering the chance of my bounty taken and he has knowledge he puts in motion to completely control the flow of my own movements whilst giving him another edge (preparation) Predicting in a way he was doing this, I word my post to respond to hostile actions and void my own dialogue because I could see ahead of time that he indeed was going to use those swings as motions, and my ability to break his almost complete control of time here is to subtly suggest that I react in the most opportune ways because I wouldn’t otherwise been able to start prior to his turn 1 having come onto the flat farmlands. If it does come down to that, then I believe he is also powerplaying this system as a means to fight me in a strict box where he is unrestricted and again this is powerplaying me because he attempts to bargain my own timeline to me as if that will make me accept the apparent actions he wrote in order to gain control over my character and repress my actions.

I believe the Invasion Rules should have no purpose or merit to actual combat rp standards, but if this is an argument he hopes to use then it should be assumed that if my name isn’t in the title, that it is an invasion, this would be a niche way to beat someone, but seeing how he understanbly has controlled my character even before this example, I argue that he is just biased and disillusioned to the fact that he’s lost.

After this fight the case should be addressed, we need to flesh out the importance of putting names in the closed titles so members understand it to the fullest capacity and do not set themselves up. Since that’s essentially what he is agreeing to have done.

I also think that if you beg to argue I have no guard up unless I talk, when my own writing says at any hostile action I would react accordingly, then I argue a hitcall against your companion as you wrote it having warned you prior to me arriving, since it possesses no ability to speech as harming you via attack (1 D-rank to your neck) which you could argue isn’t instant enough to knock you out, but it’s half your pain tolerance before you get a single END buff out, and surely would stun you or hurt enough to instill a reaction of shock or even at least a simple acknowledgement or interruption. Further even, if you noticed me before the companion did you still wrote in wording that it attacks you as signal. Ifit would still attack you, and since you’re vague and never defined this as damage, then when exactly did it do this, I’ll assume it grants me my stance-up as a backup measure case.

“It is somewhat implied that Vice sees Erebus first, then Eru does and signals to Vice. Regardless, its a flat area of land - even in the night Vice would have seen Erebus silhouette over the area.”

I disagree, a silhouette perhaps may have been seen, but if, and presuming Vice agrees that he should be stunned according to his own companions action which hasn’t fully been taken to consideration. His vision is even further rolling, blurred, disorientated and his attempt to get to noticing me should be slower, etc. Basically this is punitive enough wording to me to warrant me getting to him and the Battle Mods decision being correct, and I think it should be taken to consideration even further than that should Vice argue the agenda below.

"Your post's writing can include the environment and things you're unaware of. In creative writing, you tend to describe an overarching theme, and if you're in political intrigue, you can note why the world operates as it does."

^^ Then I argue he is damaged and unaware of it prior to his beginning of his attack and perhaps starts moving impulsively, because impulse is what drove this man to use OOC insults as feasible argument to win a fight debate, I find this hilarious.

----------------------------

You can’t control seeing me, but I can state actions you made that you forgot and manipulate those, and now using that from your own argument, I’ll  take your word and definitely see the seal with pet damage going in first.


You state and quoting me, that i will not be on guard just as you have attempted saying I didn’t have my dagger. I deny those claims and agree with the battlemod in decision. Erebus is the stronger and faster character, prior to your buffs and moves faster than Vice even after the buffs go through it can be assumed he is faster due to not needing his four seconds to max speed, and the fact Vice would move in a buffed state max run speed requiring 4 seconds, if he flies he can only move at spell speed anyways 20m/s. In needing that time, whereas Erebus will launch at max run speed, Erebus is in a proper advantageous position regardless of reaction speed (Which again due to mastery can be assumed he has). He also lands without momentum speed, the spell relinquishes it so that the character doesn’t run through sword, etc. So I argue that you can’t use any momentum based arguments in this situation.


Finally, I held my tongue but it’s shady business as everyone already knows, but if we look at the specifics of this thread, you’re acting as if this was a set-up to fight OOC and attacking me as a person OOC for a fight doesn’t make you come off as a winner, just a prick. Had you spoken to me ahead of time, we could have had a much more fun and fair game because that’s what I entered intending for, you just seem to be so paranoid that I am “talking to staff and having Noel in DMs in discussion”. This is a sign to me you are going to gaslight people or question their motives if they don’t align with yours OOC. This behavior isn’t uncommon to roleplay because of guys like you, but it won’t affect me today because of your sloppiness. Obvious OOC intention to ‘clown’ or ‘get one over on someone for ooc reasons’ seems to be your primary way of winning fights. So I know I’m at least slightly better than you at defending myself. I call evidence to you repeatedly dissing me as more examples of you thinking you’re hot shit yet afraid to fight people at equal seriousness, you’re a fraud to me… Ultimately from this alone, I call for battlemod to rule this as he has already, since to keep on ignoring my rights to my character through illicit behavior and a bad ego; I no longer feel obligated to continue the argument since I’ve been imposed upon multiple times against weak claims. His best claims simply being godmod related ideologies that he’s taken from the past. Only stating this as ideology since he tells me Combat RP has always been determined by who goes first regarding weather and time. I for one have never heard that rule? lol.

More to prove of his OOC godmod again, let me explain with the now instated way we are fighting because of his claiming this isn’t an invasion thread (I’m guessing he will say he made it and without it being deliberately stated or mentioned until now means I’m wrong, and that he can prepare attacks turn 1, I never agreed to this fight being outside invasion rules, I may have agreed to a social into a fight, but this can’t be considered as abuse of my wording when he immediately forfeited his integrity in trying to control me. He states trying to overrule me by using old fight stances and hypocritical cyber mocking as evidence whereas OOC info is completely unrelated. Had you not lied to me about the seriousness or even the fact you were going to use the OOC to attempt winning a fight, I ask the battlemod to think about this, and the fairness in that approach, I think he is right to assume I would have reacted to all your attacks (including the last one via my acrobatics-- as reason for ending you and having an aforementioned response to circling around my back) also due to slightly higher mastery than you at close quarters, I can reasonably stab you because I’m 75% invisible, meaning I’m not going to just ignore you zooming around as you seem to think because I have written that I will react to attacks as seen displaced. However, even assuming you could meet me in the middle like he mentions, you seem to think my momentum will make me slower to reaction speed than you firing off a flight spell with no way to slow down. I always come to a stop without momentum, as detailed in my spell’s description.  There's even STILL a few errors to continue going over.

I’ll return to the Invasion Ruling to elaborate.

“ Invaders must have an IC reason to invade a topic which includes the invaders knowing the individual prior to invading them, either by meeting them in person or via a third party such as the Bounty Board. This is to avoid OOC reasons getting in the way of roleplaying. “

So according to this, I need to have a reason to know you even though we’re fighting, you seem to know this much since you aren’t wrong in spreading word ahead of your own arrival turn 1, this is why I find you on the bounty board and this is also why I arrive at dusk.

1 (You argue that this is only for invasion threads, but I have to call a Battle Mod in to decide whether you are right to disallow me actions of agreement. Not be so sneaky guy, but I have done a lot less of that then you, I deem you an unfair to roleplay with, since you’re looking so hard and further mocking me with disses, I believe reasonably, you should just lose just for being this way. With what is given, I can interrupt the body of what you have written, and I never touched your own character as you tried to do mine; I merely stated things you stated and my own discoveries to how you treat strangers. Because you deliberately use the OOC to your advantage this duel, in freeing yourself from invasion rules which I’ve arguably respected while you continue to attempt manipulating them I believe this further drives the point home you’re trying to godmod me by any means for a win.


Battle Mods word should go without you saying he is biased, and discriminating against any of the staff or people on FTRP for bias just because you lost. Is further proof of your loss in respect and our time.